(An Overview of the media representation of Bihar in last 5 years)
By- Manish Kumar
Introduction:
There was a phase in the past when the media of Bihar was regarded as aggressive and upright. They were against injustice, corruption and establishment. A large number of remarkable and commendable works in the field of media were done in the past by many journalists which in turn gave them fame and appreciation at national level and even international level. The erstwhile media was more inclined and honest to the inhabitants. The tedious and applauded grassroot level works of the well known developmental journalist P Sainath in the poorest districts of Bihar made him the icon of print journalism in India who is now the inspiration for many aspiring journalists.
But with the passage of time the form, number, language, multiplicity and representation of Bihar changed drastically especially in the last five years. So what changed in Bihar in the last five years? An obvious answer that will come instantly in the minds of the readers will be the government. Of course five years ago a massive change occurred in the state when the mammoth 15 years of RJD rule by Laloo Prasad Yadav and his wife Rabri Devi culminated. On Nov 24th 2005, the state was handed over to Nitish Kumar as he was awarded with the throne attached crown as the new CM of Bihar.
After Nov. 2005 the media representation of Bihar drastically changed. From local regional media to national and international media started talking about Bihar. A bundle of positive stories started emerging from different media house. It got more heighted when Central Statistical Office (CSO) announced the GDP of Bihar as 11.03%, the second highest in India second only to Gujarat. From then Bihar is only developing from the point of view of media of Bihar. Nitish Tidal Waves blew in the state which set the mind of the state media to follow a set trend. A “Nitish Euphoria” started developing in the state for which the media is largely responsible. The state government managed media in such a way that the people can see only the positive side of the government and its policies. But before I make my point and debate on the issues concerned let’s have a walk to flashback of 70’s, 90’s and the last one decade.
There was a time during 1975 when the revolution against imposing emergency in India lead by Jay Prakash Narayan from Bihar glorified Bihar as an active state of India. His famous ‘student movement’ against the forceful will of then prime minister of India Indira Gandhi showed the courage of the students of the state to fight for democracy. Once the seat of one of the world's most glorious empires, the state was first devastated by colonial policies that enshrined feudal landlords, then shunned by a succession of Indian governments, and finally destroyed when the seeds of caste and class conflict matured into a small-scale civil war in the 1970s
Later ruling of Bihar especially by RJD in the 90's took Bihar backwards. There was no encouragement for alien investors. Roads were at their worst. Law and order was nothing for the hooligans. At the end of the rule criminal activities were at apex. Everyone can recall the kidnapping case of DPS studying Kishley and the chain of kidnapping cases followed by that case during the regime of RJD in the early months of 2005.
Elections 2005:
Point noteworthy that in earlier elections in 2005 no single political party in Bihar got majority which forced imposing of President's Rule in 2005 but later the same year Janata Dal United (JDU) lead by Nitish Kumar and its alliance with BJP were able to form a stable government in Bihar.
The citizens of Bihar had many expectations from Nitish after the 15 years RJD's rule. They were demanding for the basic facilities. The state capital of Bihar-Patna for example was devoid of a proper drainage system. Working women were scared to remain outside home after 7pm. The administration was not cooperative to the common people. There were hardly any investments from any industrialists in Bihar and people were forced to migrate outside for jobs. There were hardly any good national colleges in Bihar and so even the student class was also forced to move outside for their higher studies. Even he agreed that the path would not be smooth and many things need to be done for the welfare of Bihar, to uplift the status of Bihar.
This was the case pre 2005 but the later picture was very different as told by different media house. Actually the whole representation of media changed drastically post 2005.. After Nitish Kumar took the charge of Bihar in the same year it changed the view of media and the way it portrays the state. It was November 24th 2005, when after many speculations for the 31st chief minister of Bihar Nitish Kumar took the charge of Bihar. It was an end to the massive 15 years ruling of Rastriya Janata Dal (RJD) led by Laloo Prasad Yadav and partially by his wife Rabri Devi.
Media Coverage before 5 years:
Earlier excluding the last five years, last twenty years was a time where media representation of Bihar was entirely different. There was nothing very special and positive from that state. Media used to cover scams, poverty, development stories and stories related to life of Laloo Prasad Yadav who was more famous for his comic character and the way he talked. Media used to cover how he celebrated Holi or chat. Besides that lots of ground work was done by the media people in those era. Bihar was a state were journalists used to learn the basics of development stories.
Let us have a look on the media reports and coverage of that time. The era of late 80’s and 90’s and early 2000’s. The very noted journalist of present time P Sainath was given fellowship from Times of India to work on his ideas. He travelled to the poorest districts of India and covered many rural stories on the life of the poor and the underprivileged. In Bihar he went to many remote villages of districts like Chapra, Samastipur, Palamu (now in Jharkhand) and many other places. He told stories from these places on how the poor are exploited, how they are devoid of the very basic things. The result was that many of his stories brought changes to the people of those rural remote villages. He compiled most of his works in a book named as “Everybody loves a good drought” which is now a reference for any journalism colleges in India.
Down to Earth on September 30, 1993 reported on the embankment issue titled “The Embankement War” where they talked about the embankment issue of the Kosi river in Bihar which is the cause of tragic floods which costs many lives from time to time and is called as the sorrow of Bihar for the same reason.
On 28 February 1996 Outlook gave a review and detailed story about a scam in animal husbandry department titled “Crores from Chicken feed”. It talked about the scam in the state where the officials from different districts became a part of the scam and for their personal welfare did not care for thereal cause for which the money was given.
Outlook also on Dec 08, 2002 in an article titled ‘Banian Tree’ talked about the participation of Laloo Prasad Yadav in an upcoming film named Padmshree laloo Prasad yadav. It talked about his desire to work for it. His connections and love for bollywood. It talked about basically about his nature and desire for bollywood.
Down to Earth on June 30, 1999 reports Bihar Government critised by the high court for not implementing what the state High Court asked them to clear the bills for clearing the water logs but they did not. In a hearing the court criticized them and ordered them to do it as soon as it was possible.
Media coverage post 2005
Let’s have a look how the media reacted or represented Bihar in the last five years. Most of the media projected the state as a state moving towards development. Hardly anyone covered Bihar in a negative form. Almost all media forms came up with positive stories to show the state is booming in all aspects after the new CM took the charge. They glorified the growth and in a way and made Nitish Kumar a big star in media.
However the media got proper data to support their stories to show Bihar is growing and developing but at the same time it ignored other relevant data which contradicts the hypothesis they made. Few years back the state GDP was announced and it shocked people from different sections of the society. The GDP of Bihar reached 11.03% the second highest in the country, second only to Gujrat. There were many other data that supplemented the media in their stories. Before we analyze more on the representation of Bihar in media lets have a look on the coverage in the last five years.
Growth in infrastructure and basic things: When we talk about development in any state first of all we talk about the roads, electricity, water and other basic things. Roads in Bihar were known for its bad conditions. Newsweek in its story on the state titled “From worst to near first” by Jacob Overdorf (Dec 1, 2010) tried to depict the growth and development of the state in terms of some basic needs with the help of data. According to the media report the administration laid 6,800 kilometers of roads, built 1,600 bridges and culverts, and cut journey time in half in many areas. Car sales eclipsed kidnappings, as crimes by roving bandits fell steadily from 1,297 to 640 and kidnappings for ransom dropped from 411 to 66 between 2004 and 2008.
Talking about tourism growth it revealed Bodh Gaya, the site where the Buddha attained his enlightenment—the number of foreign tourists shot up from 95,000 to 356,000 over the past two years.
Talking about tourism growth it revealed Bodh Gaya, the site where the Buddha attained his enlightenment—the number of foreign tourists shot up from 95,000 to 356,000 over the past two years.
Vijay Simha came up with his story titled “Try me not society” in Tehelka (Feb 06, 2010) where he started with the story of Omar Heinzeen who was a resident of Bihar and after 2005 he came to settle in Bihar from Dubai and was all set to start his business in Darbhanga for road construction. This story was the onset of coverage of entrepreneurs coming to the state for its welfare. Later many other media house also tried to cover some other business people from Bihar who settled there to expand their business. The same story also covered the story of the famous Bollywood director Prakash Jha who is from Bihar. He told Tehelka that he already started working on construction of malls and opening of news channel in his state and encouraged others to invest in the state.
Caste and politics: After some time Tehelka again came up with another positive story by Ajit Sahi on the state titled ‘A tide in the affairs of Bihar’ which talked on various issues of development in the state and tried to find out the reasons of the growth in Bihar and the strategies by Nitish Kumar. In the story he said that the main reason of the positive side is - politics above caste. It said Nitish Kumar always talked about development and never on caste politics which made the man a more secular and a figure of development.
Data Game: Outlook in its cover story “Mind the shadows” by Lola Nayar tried to play with the available data. With the available data they showed that all crimes in the state have reduced and some of the major crimes were drastically reduced after 2005. The cases of murders, kidnapping and extortions came down appreciably which tried to improve the law and order in the state and gave a feeling among the people of the state that they are safe at their place.
But the same article of Outlook compared many other aspects of the state with the overall growth of India and showed that it has to go a long way. It depicted its performance in terms of immunization, roads, roads connected to villages, health, education, per capita income and many other things.
Health Sector: However when we talk about health sector in Bihar experts opine that it has shown improvement. New York Times (April 2010) in its story titled “Turnaround of India state could serve as a model” reported “2.5 million school-age children were not attending classes; by 2010 that number was reduced to fewer than 800,000. Clinics that had been seeing 30 patients a month because they had no medicine or doctors were staffed up and restocked. By 2006, the patient load had increased tenfold.”
Times of India in December 2009 reported “The face of government hospitals has drastically improved. Dr. R K Singh, Medical Superintendent, Patna Medical College and Hospital (PMCH) state’s most reputed government hospital said, “In the last five years government hospitals have gone sea changes. Now more and more people are gaining faith in government hospitals and more number of people from all walks of life are coming to us fro treatment. Pollution control, medicine distribution and many other things were upgraded.”
Complaints dealings: You might have seen Anil Kapoor establishing letter box for the complaints to CM but Nitish was one step ahead. He urged to meet the common people face to face and thus introduced the concept of ‘Mukyamantri ka Janata Darbar' which was later changed to ‘Janata ke darbar mein Mukyamantri' where he solved the problems of majority of the people so quickly and he was accompanied with a team to do so that included the DGP of the state and other high officials. This was widely covered by the local media like PTN news, Bihar News and others.
Education: Talking about the education scenario in the state it also got revolutionsed as shown by local newspapers regularly. Times of India regularly covered education in the state. When it was announced that Bihar government can build one Indian Institute of technology (IIT) in Bihar Nitish Kumar generously gave 500 acres of land in Bihta (near Patna) for the establishment of the same. Now almost two years have passed and IIT in Patna is working well. Soon AIIMS in Patna is going to start. So the top most institutes in engineering and medical sciences are going to get rooted here.
Local media reported other educational matters of the state. Once upon a time Nalanda University in Bihar used to be a centre for national and International studies in India. But this historical University of India which glorified Bihar and India was closed and now one can see the ruins of this University in Nalanda almost 250 Kms from Patna. Nitish Kumar has the firm dedication to establish the same glory to Bihar and thus started working for the reopening of the same. Few months ago former president of India A P J Abul Kalam visited Nalanda and work to restore the University has begun. Noble Prize winner Amartya Sen has already given his consent for working in Nalanda University and recently Nitish discussed some plans with the founder of Microsoft Bill Gates for the welfare of Bihar.
Outcome
The outcome was of course evident in the state and was appreciated by the people of Bihar. The media to a large extent changed its representation of the state. Almost most of the national and even international magazine like- India Today, Outlook, Tehelka, The Week, Frontline and even international magazine like Newsweek came up with positive stories from Bihar. So the media which talked about crime, scams and caste politics reframed their minds and the whole scene was changed.
So the outcome was clear, it was predetermined by the different political party that Nitish has proved himself as a persona of development and the people of Bihar would give him majority of votes. Recently he was declared as the Best CM of the year by CNN-IBN and Hindustan Times in 2007 and Indian of the year-Politics 2008 and Reformer of the year 2009 by Economic Times.
Negative side of Media on Bihar:
The media got flowed up with the development stories. Most of them neglected the other face of the state, the still existing huge poverty, unemployment and many other things. Media ignored basically what the CM ignored from his side. The environmental problems and others were not projected nicely in the media. Everywhere only development and growth stories were shown.
One very important point that I want to make here is that when it comes to national media some of them do not get totally inclined to Nitish Kumar and do some homework. But when we talk about the regional and local media they show their full loyalty towards the government. Point noteworthy that the traditional media is getting corrupted the new emerging new media is becoming more authentic. The new media also checks, counters and corrects you through the unique feature of interactivity. It allows you to counter attack if you are biased or incorrect which the traditional media do not offer. The readers of this story can present their contradicting views if they want, or they can support and agree with my views. Let’s now try to do the autopsy of this kind of behavior by the traditional local media. Here are some points to ponder over-
Money driven media: A very interesting point to ponder over is that during the Nitish regime the media of Bihar made a very good business. The amount of money invested on publication of government advertisements in print and electronic media drastically increased. The Nitish government in the very first four years of their regime increased the amount spent on ads in media. They took annual ads placed in newspapers from Rs 4.5 crore to Rs 25.25 crore. On November 24, 2009, on the eve of completion of four years of Nitish government, in a single day advertisements worth Rs 1.15 crore were given in 24 different national as well as regional dailies. Delhi and Patna based Hindi dailies such as Hindustan, Dainik Jagran, Prabhat Khabar and Aj had the lion’s share of around Rs 72.5 lakh. (Source: The Hoot, based on RTI filed by Afroz Alam Sahil).
So when the government becomes the agency of giving financial aid to the media it is difficult for them to be transparent and unbiased. This system of symbiotic relation between state government and the media hampers the authenticity and responsibility of media and in a way it is becoming more and more corrupt day by day. It is ironical when the medium which breaks the story of many corruptions becomes the victim of the same and then it loses their right to finger point on other.
The Dark Side of MNERGA: Just changing the name of any project and associating it with Mahatma Gandhi does not ensure transparency. MNERGA is a well known project where the many corrupt people can make good money at short time. They can easily exploit the illiterate and at the same time take the money meant for the poor living below the poverty line.
On December 2009 some NGOs organized a public meeting at the BIS building in Patna. Villagers from different parts of Bihar came there to share their experiences and obstructions they feel when it comes to MNREGA implement at grassroot level. Around 200 general people mostly illiterate villagers converged and shared their experiences. They shared how the mukhiya or the gram sevaks fool them because they are illiterate. In most of the cases when employment is not available they do not support the poor with unemployment allowance. They (villagers) told the authorities concerned how the gram sevaks take their signatures and withdraw the money and give them a small amount against the sanctioned amount of Rs 104. Point noteworthy that even villages not so far from the capital faced these problems. Villages not even 50 Kms away from the state capital like Panapur has suffered with these problems. There is a huge amount of existing corruption in MNERGA in Bihar.
Interestingly this news did not get space in Times of India the next day. The media hardly work on these issues. The era of developmental rural journalist P.Sainath has gone and is blurring with the passing days. The media need to learn journalism once again from the living legend and should have his book ‘Everybody loves a good drought” as a learning book for journalism if they forgot what journalism is all about. No media bothers to meet the requirements of the poor underprivileged people.
Kosi problem: From a long time the problem of Saptakosi River is existing. This problem is related with our neighboring country Nepal. The river is known as the sorrow of Bihar. It results in one of the most disastrous floods of Bihar. But none of the government thought out of a plan to find a permanent solution to this problem. Many a times the floods came and many of the lives was lost, livelihood and houses perished but nothing has been done till now as a permanent solution. In the election manifesto in year 2005 different parties offered different things but now even after five years nothing has been done for permanent solution. Following is the promise the parties gave to the people in their manifesto.
Usual
rash of promises Bihar assembly election manifesto issues | ||||
Dams
in Nepal |
Drainage
|
Embankment
|
Relief
| |
Rashtriya Janata
Dal |
Only
solution to flood control; state government helpless |
No mention
|
No mention
|
Demands more
money in disaster relief fund. Gloats on saving people with helicopters |
Janata Dal
(United) |
Push Nepal
to make dams |
Desilt river
beds; set up a technology mission |
No mention
|
No mention
|
Lok Janshakti
Party |
Centre
should talk to Nepal |
Developing
livelihood on waterlogged land a priority |
Better
embankments for 700,000 hectares of flood-affected land |
Village-level
training on disaster management. Distribute first-aid kits. Create flood proofing zone |
Bharatiya Janata
Party |
No mention
|
Integrated
water policy. Bridges along all canals, roads, railway to allow drainage |
Expert team
to assess maintenance, repair work Assess embankments that breach every year |
No mention
of disaster management. Need to empower fisherfolk and control riverbank erosion to prevent land disputes |
Congress
|
No mention
of dams. Need for a geological survey and new policy |
Bridges
along all roads for drainage. No mention of pucca roads in villages |
No mention,
but wants a re-look at entire flood control exercise (indirectly acknowledges mistakes of past Congress governments |
No mention
of disaster management or relief. Need for a flood proofing zone policy |
*(Source-Down to Earth)
The Drama of Modi issue: If one can remember the time of election campaign in Bihar last year. Gujrat CM Narendra Modi was about to visit the state for campaigns as their party has coalition with BJP in the state. But something happened where Narendra Modi said that he helped Bihar during Kosi floods and this man returned the money worth 5 crore to him out of personal issues. The money was meant for the flood victims of Bihar but he did not care. Most media covered the story superficially and all they talked about the politics and power of Nitish kumar and Modi and the election consequences. Hardly anyone cared to go the flood affected area and see the real condition there. How much rehabilitation they got and what were the real situations at a time when the flood relief amount was returned. Only Star News did the job that visited the area and did a story on conflict of personal pride of Kumar and public welfare. The special show was named “Nitish Kumar ki Nautanki”.
The Modi issue was a clear issue which showed how the personal pride of the CM is far above then the general welfare of the public, that too far above then the welfare of the flood affected victims of the Kosi River.
Intra state disparity: Although the state government seems very happy for their recent GDSP of 11.18% but at the same time when we talk about GDDP (Gross District Domestic Product) it shows that GDDP of the capital as Rs. 37, 737 whereas district like Sheohar has recorded the lowest marked as Rs. 4398 showing critical intra state economic disparity.
DISTRICT
|
GDDP
|
PATNA
|
Rs. 37,737
|
MUNGER
|
Rs. 12,370
|
BEGUSARAI
|
Rs. 10,409
|
JAMUI
|
Rs. 5516
|
ARARIA
|
Rs. 5245
|
SHEOHAR
|
Rs. 4398
|
*(Source: Economic Survey for the year 2010-11, Bihar)
Poverty: According to National Sample Survey 2004-2005 show that the incidence of poverty defined as the percentage of the population below the poverty line in terms of monthly per capita expenditure was 42.1% in rural Bihar against 28.3% in rural India as a whole which is of course higher. Economic Survey 2010-11 says that price rise has been higher in Bihar than in India as a whole. Between 2007-08 and October 2010, the consumer price index for industrial labourers rose by 53 points in Bihar, whereas it rose by 48 points in India during the same time. This means that inflation in the state is badly affecting the lives of the poor people. Where is the media? Can’t they see these problems?
Moreover when we see the contribution of different sectors in the last one decade we can see a different picture when we compare it with the picture 10 years back. In Bihar more than 60% people directly or indirectly connected to primary sector whose contribution to the GDSP is decreasing with the passage of time it is difficult to ensure the welfare of all class of people.
SECTOR
|
CONTRIBUTION TO GDSP BEFORE 10 YRS
|
CONTRIBUTION TO GDSP NOW
|
PRIMARY
|
39%
|
21.74%
|
SECONDARY
|
10.5%
|
16.61%
|
TERTIARY
|
50.5%
|
61.65%
|
*(Source-Economic Survey 2010-11)
Mahatma Gandhi Setu: The very famous bridge made over the Ganga river which connects the state capital with the north Bihar is deterioting with the passage of time and from time to time some news of accidents comes into picture but the government has not made any concrete plan for a permanent solution. For media this is not an issue.
System for Batwari rule: The government has made its mind to implement a law where the lands of the rich people or even middle class people will be given to the farmers who work on the fields for some years. Actually many people have their land in villages and they deploy some poor farmers to take care of them and give some share for that but if the rule comes in action the lands which could be a legacy or bought with money some time by them will be freely gifted to them. This would reduce the income source for the middle and rich class people. This sounds a very irrational and unjust rule. But not much was spoken in media on that.
Nitish’s Vikas Yatra: Nitish Kumar not only works but he makes sure that people know that this man is working a lot for their welfare. Occasionally he starts so called Vikas yatra telling people what the government is doing for them. For this so private choppers are hired which costs appreciable if the yatra continues for more time. Hardly anyone questions him on the amount spent on this yatras which also includes staying at some good place during nights. In the last 5 years we have seen many positive stories in Bihar but that does not mean that Bihar has bloomed in every aspects. It does not mean that the problem of law and order is not there in the state or poverty has been eradicated. There are many problems existing in the state where there is need for the mainstream media to focus and bring the attention of the government.
Fewer investments: Although the government claims that investors and private players are keen to invest in their state and many players visit also to the state but not all of them really invest due to many factors. It’s more important to invest their rather than just visiting and giving the hope that they are satisfied with the state performance.
New York Times on 18 February, 2008 came up with a story titled ‘The Indian economic boom bypasses Bihar’ told about the problem of investments in the state. It said, “The World Bank loaned Kumar's government $225 million, but private investors have not been so enthusiastic. India's biggest industrialists have been visiting the state capital, Patna, but have kept their money firmly in their pockets.
The sad fact of Bihar is that it offers few or no raw materials, intermittent power, terrible roads, a reputation as a place where businessmen are kidnapped and some of the least business-friendly bureaucrats in the capitalist world.”
So there is need to wait for the real big investments to say that the situation has really improved.
Criminalisation of Politics: Although Nitish Kumar claims that their government is not run by criminals and he is very strict when it comes to breaking of laws by the tainted politicians and he does not allow them to do anything illegal. He always tries to make a very clear and pure image of himself and his party when it comes to organization of his party. But the recent revelation about the details of tainted politicians who got filed nominations was a surprise. The Party JDU who always took RJD and LJP for harvesting criminals in their party this time had the highest number of tainted candidates in the elections.
POLITICAL PARTIES
|
TAINTED CANDIDATES
|
BJP
|
41
|
JDU
|
31
|
NDA
|
72
|
RJD
|
57
|
LJP
|
13
|
*(Source: Election Commission of India)
Gap between Execution and Announcement: There is a good difference between the announcement of any project and proposals and real commencement and execution of the same. Upto 2010, the State Investment promotion Board (SIPM) approved as 398 project proposals with proposed investment of Rs. 1.82 lakh crore. But out of that only 45 have started working and 104 are said to be at an advanced state but there is hardly any news on the remaining 249 projects.
Supporting are liabilities: The support institutions of Bihar, instead of becoming assets, are themselves becoming liabilities. The Bihar State Financial Corporation (BSFC) and Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation (BICICO), who were responsible to provide financial support to industries, are sick primarily due to poor recovery and are waiting for revival
Why the progress got so highlighted:
Self Censored Media: It will not be wrong to state that the traditional media of Bihar is going through a phase of self censorship where they hardly give emphasis on the negative side of Bihar. Of course it will be difficult for them otherwise they can lose a very good client with which they are enjoying a good symbiotic relationship. For them there is development everywhere. There are hardly any problems in the state. They can’t see that the basic things of the aam aadmi-Electricity, proper drainage, water, waste management is not touched by the government.
Online portals: There are around ten online portals on Bihar which keep the readers from all around the world updated on what is happening in Bihar. One benefit of these portals is that these are more global. Readers from all over the world can read it and express their opinions through comments. Biharis living all over the world read these portals and gets to know the updates from their motherland. They perceive what the portals say.
Social networking sites: The growth of social networking sites in the last 5 years is appreciable and with the passage of time it is going amore and more popular. One effect it had was sharing of news and views and encouragement to discussion and interaction. Biharis living in different parts of the world felt very proud in sharing positive stories which got published anywhere because they were used to listen only negative stories defaming Bihar. So they shared it in large on these platforms which helped them to spread the notion that Bihar is developing.
Better public relations: The present Bihar government worked hard to increase the PR department of the state. It dealt nicely and effectively with the people, NGOs, media and other concerned people. This better public relation helped further to spread the same notion. PR is very crucial in dealing with the outside people and the government felt the need and they worked hard on it and the outcome was favourable to them.
Better RTI system: In a recent survey last year Bihar came under top ten states of India where RTI was implemented and practiced nicely. The state government worked hard to make RTI simpler and effective. This helped the journalist, analysts, NGOs and other people concerned to know different issues in a better way.
Conclusion:
So from all the discussions we had above this the point I want to make is that in the last five years the media representation of Bihar has drastically changed. Hardly new investigative stories are done. If anyhow someone dares to do, they are discouraged by the owners of the media fearing the loss of ad revenue from the government. Some media houses are becoming the mouth piece of the state government.
There are number of problems in the state where the media needs to pay attention. Already media has lost credibility through many irresponsible behaviors in the past. If the media has to maintain its credibility it has to work honestly and the symbiotic relationship between the media and the government needs to be broken for the welfare of the people to maintain the dignity of journalism.
